Rand Paul Calls for Debate on War
NO ADVERTISING, GOVERNMENT OR CORPORATE FUNDING
DONATE TODAY

Rand Paul Calls for Debate on War


Rand Paul said today that there needs to be a national debate on Afghanistan and presidential power -   November 8, 2010
Members don't see ads. If you are a member, and you're seeing this appeal, click here


Share to Facebook Share to Twitter


I support the real news because they deal with real issues, not meaningless articles and sound bites - Gary
Log in and tell us why you support TRNN

Precis

Courtesy Washington Stakeout Responding to Washington Stakeout, Senator-Elect Rand Paul said today that there needs to be a national debate on Afghanistan, that Congress has abdicated its role and that US actions today should not be based on the debate ten years ago or the resolution of ten years ago. During his interview with ABC, just before being questioned by Stakeout, Paul call for cutting the military budget as well as other federal programs.

Paul calls himself a “conservative constitutionalist” and said he wants a war declaration vote rather than a use of force resolution generally. Still he seemed to stop short of calling the current situation unconstitutional, or saying exactly how he thinks it should be rectified. Article 1, Section 8 of course says that Congress has the power “to declare war”.

Transcript

Rand Paul Calls for Debate on WarQUESTION, (VOICEOVER): Senator-Elect, are there examples where Bush exceeded proper limits of executive power in the “War on Terror,” and is Obama doing the same now?

RAND PAUL, SENATOR-ELECT: Well, I think that I would like to see when we go to war that we declare war formally, and I think we should go to war reluctantly, and I think we do as Americans believe in a certain reluctance towards going to war, but I think when we had a use of force resolution instead of a declaration of war resolution, that lessened the debate somehow, and I think it needs to be elevated to an incredibly important plateau in order to discuss it. So I will argue that when we go into hostilities, we declare war formally and we donÂ’t do it with a use of force resolution.

QUESTION, (VOICEOVER): So do you think that that precludes doing something about Afghanistan to rectify that, I guess what you would say, unconstitutional status?

PAUL: No, I think — well no, I think what we need to figure out is where to go forward in Afghanistan. We need to have a national debate and say, is our national security still threatened? I don’t think it’s enough to have had the debate ten years ago, and just accept that that’s the same ongoing — the situation hasn’t changed. We’ve been there for ten years, and I think Congress has abdicated its role. Congress needs to have more of a role in talking about foreign policy. So there needs to be a debate within the Senate and the House, over what is in our national security interest and has it changed in Afghanistan? Can we do nation-building? Do we have the money to do nation-building? Is it effective? Those are things that should be discussed and should not be all based on a resolution from over ten years ago.

QUESTION, (VOICEOVER): Beyond the discussion that needs to happen, whatÂ’s your position, in terms of, are we in violation of the Constitution? How do you rectify that? And also in terms of Yemen and Pakistan now?

PAUL: I think we need to have a debate over it; at the very least, is we need to begin to debate. I donÂ’t think weÂ’re even having the debate. So I think itÂ’s a step forward to have the debate.


Comments

Our automatic spam filter blocks comments with multiple links and multiple users using the same IP address. Please make thoughtful comments with minimal links using only one user name. If you think your comment has been mistakenly removed please email us at contact@therealnews.com

Comments


Latest Stories


Not Just for Better Pay: Seattle Teachers Vote to Strike for Social Justice
Guatemalan President Molina Arrested After Resignation
10 Years After Katrina, Test Scores Tell One Story, Residents Tell Another
Deep Contradictions in Obama's Arctic Policies
Capitalism Will Hit the Wall Again, Hard - Heiner Flassbeck on RAI (5/5)
Court Rules Argentina Creditors Can't Seize Its Central Bank
Why is There Systemic Police Abuse in Baltimore?
Lawyers of Six Officers in Gray Case: Move Trial Out of Baltimore, And Away From Its Politics
Obama Secures Iran Nuclear Deal in Senate
The Necessity for Higher Wages - Heiner Flassbeck on Reality Asserts Itself (4/5)
Activist Kwame Rose Arrested Outside Freddie Gray Pre-Trial Hearings
Former Cop Says Freddie Gray Slowdown Didn't Prompt Crime Spike
TRNN Livestream Outside Freddie Gray Pre-trial Hearing
Trade Union General Strike Across India
In Landmark Ruling, California Prisons Halt Solitary Confinement
Veolia Pulls Out of Israel
Is Erdogan Creating a Perfect Storm to Get His Party in Power?
The US Dollar and the Search for a "Reasonable" Capitalist - Heiner Flassbeck on RAI (3/5)
Pre-trial Hearings for Freddie Gray Case Start Wednesday
What Has Changed Since Freddie Gray's Killing?
Labor, Bernie Sanders, and Direct Action: Larry Hanley and Morrigan Phillips
Is Obama Greenwashing His Climate Record in Alaska?
Key Pocomoke Councilwoman Says City Doesn't Speak for Her in Secret Meeting Controversy
Days of Revolt: The Revolutionary, Caged
A Broken System Breaks Families
Cheney Blasts Iran Deal, Forgets That as VP Iran Got Closer to Getting Nukes
DC Mayor's New Plan to Stem City Violence: More Policing
Extraordinary Brutality Inflicted on Civilians in Yemen
India's Economy Can Grow Without Increasing Carbon Emissions
The Media Assassin and Shooting the Enemy

RealNewsNetwork.com, Real News Network, Real News, Real News For Real People, IWT are trademarks and service marks of IWT.TV inc. "The Real News" is the flagship show of IWT and Real News Network.

All original content on this site is copyright of The Real News Network. Click here for more

Problems with this site? Please let us know

Linux VPS Hosting by Star Dot Hosting