NO ADVERTISING, GOVERNMENT OR CORPORATE FUNDING
DONATE TODAY


  November 8, 2010

Rand Paul Calls for Debate on War


Rand Paul said today that there needs to be a national debate on Afghanistan and presidential power
Members don't see ads. If you are a member, and you're seeing this appeal, click here
   


Share to Facebook Share to Twitter


Thanks for providing such a reliable news website - Shakur K
Log in and tell us why you support TRNN


precis

Courtesy Washington Stakeout Responding to Washington Stakeout, Senator-Elect Rand Paul said today that there needs to be a national debate on Afghanistan, that Congress has abdicated its role and that US actions today should not be based on the debate ten years ago or the resolution of ten years ago. During his interview with ABC, just before being questioned by Stakeout, Paul call for cutting the military budget as well as other federal programs.

Paul calls himself a “conservative constitutionalist” and said he wants a war declaration vote rather than a use of force resolution generally. Still he seemed to stop short of calling the current situation unconstitutional, or saying exactly how he thinks it should be rectified. Article 1, Section 8 of course says that Congress has the power “to declare war”.


transcript

Rand Paul Calls for Debate on WarQUESTION, (VOICEOVER): Senator-Elect, are there examples where Bush exceeded proper limits of executive power in the “War on Terror,” and is Obama doing the same now?

RAND PAUL, SENATOR-ELECT: Well, I think that I would like to see when we go to war that we declare war formally, and I think we should go to war reluctantly, and I think we do as Americans believe in a certain reluctance towards going to war, but I think when we had a use of force resolution instead of a declaration of war resolution, that lessened the debate somehow, and I think it needs to be elevated to an incredibly important plateau in order to discuss it. So I will argue that when we go into hostilities, we declare war formally and we donÂ’t do it with a use of force resolution.

QUESTION, (VOICEOVER): So do you think that that precludes doing something about Afghanistan to rectify that, I guess what you would say, unconstitutional status?

PAUL: No, I think — well no, I think what we need to figure out is where to go forward in Afghanistan. We need to have a national debate and say, is our national security still threatened? I don’t think it’s enough to have had the debate ten years ago, and just accept that that’s the same ongoing — the situation hasn’t changed. We’ve been there for ten years, and I think Congress has abdicated its role. Congress needs to have more of a role in talking about foreign policy. So there needs to be a debate within the Senate and the House, over what is in our national security interest and has it changed in Afghanistan? Can we do nation-building? Do we have the money to do nation-building? Is it effective? Those are things that should be discussed and should not be all based on a resolution from over ten years ago.

QUESTION, (VOICEOVER): Beyond the discussion that needs to happen, whatÂ’s your position, in terms of, are we in violation of the Constitution? How do you rectify that? And also in terms of Yemen and Pakistan now?

PAUL: I think we need to have a debate over it; at the very least, is we need to begin to debate. I donÂ’t think weÂ’re even having the debate. So I think itÂ’s a step forward to have the debate.



Comments

Our automatic spam filter blocks comments with multiple links and multiple users using the same IP address. Please make thoughtful comments with minimal links using only one user name. If you think your comment has been mistakenly removed please email us at contact@therealnews.com

latest stories

Indiana Primary: Trump Knocks Out Cruz & Sanders Upsets Clinton
Greenpeace Leaks Secret Pro-Corporate Trade Agreement
Repression Has Become the Norm in Honduras
Spontaneous Protests in Baghdad Green Zone Show Cracks in the Security Apparatus
Detroit Teachers Shut Down Schools for Second Day Over Lack of Pay
Days of Revolt: The Assault of the Animal Agriculture Industry
The Real News of the Day - May 3, 2016
Chris Hedges: Activist Rev. Berrigan Targeted by Church Hierarchy
"Soft Coup" in Brazil is Destroying the Workers' Party and Social Programs
Before Freddie Gray, there was Tyrone West
Activists March Against Police Shooting of a 14-Year-Old in Baltimore
The Real News of the Day - May 2, 2016
A Global Roundup of May Day Marches and Protests
US and UK Arms Sales Fueling War Crimes in Yemen
If We Don't Get It Shut It Down!: Theatre as a voice of the people.
Sanders Supporters on Road to Insurrection in Democratic Party?
Jobless Economy and Citizenless Democracy (3/3)
Allegations of Anti-Semitism Fired up Ahead of Pivotal UK Local Elections
Jesse Jackson and Bernie Sanders: Comparing Two "Movement" Campaigns
Robert Scheer Talks With Eddie Conway About Making Real News After Prison
A Tale of Two Police Shootings
Lucifer, Trump and Who's Behind the GOP Factions?
Air Strikes on Aleppo Hospital Indiscriminate or Targeted?
Euroskeptic Conservatives Driving the Brexit
The Real News of the Day - April 29, 2016
Tired of Waiting for the Courts, Students Get Their Own Measure of Justice for Freddie Gray
The Real News of the Day - April 28, 2016
Trump Embraces Israel and Promotes "Western Civilization"
Brazilian Senate to Vote on President Rousseff's Impeachment
The All-Volunteer Military and American National Security

TheRealNewsNetwork.com, RealNewsNetwork.com, The Real News Network, Real News Network, The Real News, Real News, Real News For Real People, IWT are trademarks and service marks of Independent World Television inc. "The Real News" is the flagship show of IWT and The Real News Network.

All original content on this site is copyright of The Real News Network. Click here for more

Problems with this site? Please let us know

Linux VPS Hosting by Star Dot Hosting